Discussion and conclusion are the beating heart of scientific research; their quality differentiates between ordinary and excellent work. The inexperienced researcher will perform satisfactorily by following the standard research process, applying adequate research methods and methodology techniques and using the proper data collection tools. However, the excellent discussion goes beyond mere data and information by delving into new perspectives supported by pragmatic argumentation and logical reasoning. Critical thinking depends on logic to refine and improve the linguistic expression of ideas, which enhances argumentative skills.
Discussion and conclusion are the beating heart of scientific research; their quality differentiates between ordinary and excellent work. The inexperienced researcher will perform satisfactorily by following the standard research process, applying adequate research methods and methodology techniques and using the proper data collection tools. However, the excellent discussion goes beyond mere data and information by delving into new perspectives supported by pragmatic argumentation and logical reasoning. Critical thinking depends on logic to refine and improve the linguistic expression of ideas, which enhances argumentative skills.